That Shahid Afridi’s poster on my room’s door is no more there… He was my  cricket hero in school days. Friends and family, everyone who knew me, asked  with sheer displeasure why I supported the staunch rival in every match...  except of course the ones with India…As a child, I could hardly understand this  furore over such a trivial issue.
During every Indo-Pak match, I had to  convince them that I did love Sachin, Dravid and Dada but Shahid Afridi a little  more than them… that’s all. They would tell me how different we are from ‘them’.  I could spot the difference between Afridi’s silky locks and Sachin’s curly  tresses, but the distinct nationalities they carried were not something I was  big enough to handle. Watching them together on the field was the only possible  thing I could do then. But as I grew older...I began to feel the difference  between ‘us’ and ‘them’.
Besides what I read in history books, there was  more to this deep divide between the two neighbours…this rivalry… this  hostility, which extends beyond the cricket field…even after more than 62 years  of partition.
Since 1947, the time India was partitioned, Pakistan has  fought three major wars with us, the last being the Kargil War in  1999.
Despite the bitter history of wars we share, the Indian leadership  has repeatedly offered olive branches to the neighbour, though it has never  given the desired fruits.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recently said one  cannot choose one’s neighbour and that every state should try to make friends  with his neighbours…I agree with Dr Singh but as we say “Love can be one-sided  but friendship cannot be...”
From launching rockets on the border  villages in Punjab to the recurring incidents of infiltration, our neighbour has  always, without fail, broken our trust.
More than a 100 times, 129 to be  precise, the neighbour has breached the land ceasefire agreement and infiltrated  the Indian air space almost 50 times in last four years, according to a  newspaper report.
In the wake of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, our relations  with Pakistan have gone even more sore. The deadliest attack on India’s  financial hub on November 26, 2008, triggered a possible war between the two  countries. Speculations were high that India this time would retaliate with a  ‘real’ war, but thankfully, this did not turn into reality. Another War, I  believe, would not solve the problem of security here.
International or  Global Terrorism is the biggest headache for every country today. And this  so-called ‘War on Terror’ initiated by Uncle Sam is incomplete till the time  there is coordination and cooperation between neighbours.
But how can we  expect cooperation from a country who has used Terrorism as part of its ‘Foreign  Policy’ for decades.
Pakistan’s former President General Pervez Musharraf  revealed in an interview this year that the American aid during his tenure was  used to strengthen defence against India. This doesn’t come as a surprise to any  Indian, I can bet. There are numerous incidents that make us doubt our  neighbour’s seriousness in its efforts towards a healthy and strong relationship  with us.
Despite assurances of cooperation in the investigations in the  biggest terror attack India suffered, the neighbour’s attitude has been  absolutely disappointing.
Pakistan, torn with internal strifes and a  series of suicide bombs and terrorist attacks almost every second day, is  bearing the fruits of its own deeds. The Frankenstein it had fed with the  American money has come out of the closet and killing its own master.
But  it’s a matter of concern for India too. What if the Talibans succeed in their  misdeeds? What do they really want? Aren’t the attacks on schools, Universities,  posh market places, state banks, suffice to understand their  motive?
Every common man knows that the terrorists do not want economic  prosperity, democracy, equality, education, anything that dilutes their  misdemeanours.
Terror doesn’t spare any religion, any community, anyone.  Even my journalist friends in Pakistan have become a target for the militant’s  vengeance now. The latest attack on Pakistan’s Press club indicates that the  Terrorists want to mute every voice that’s raised against them. Talibans have  killed hundreds of thousands innocent men and women, children and policemen  alike, in the last three months alone.
Is this the kind of price,  Pakistan is willing to pay to keep the terrorists alive and kicking in its own  state? How many more innocent lives is it willing to keep at stake all out of  its insecurity with India?
Pakistan is a democratic failure. What else  can be expected after four military takeovers in four decades? The Army has  always been strong there and the news of two serving Pakistani Army officers  being involved in India’s biggest terror attack shatters all hopes of renewed  trust with the neighbour.
No one wants a War, but in situations like  these, forget friendship even diplomatic relations are in  jeopardy.
Terror has no face, no loyality. The Terrorists which are still  operating from the neighbouring soil will continue to target India. But in doing  so, they can go to the extent of killing anyone and everyone that comes their  way.
Ever since the Pakistani Army launched offensive against the  Talibans in the areas bordering Afghanistan, it has witnessed a bloodbath  killing their own men. At a time when Pakistan is going through its worst phase,  the PM’s statement that India wants peace and stability for its neighbour holds  great importance.
Pakistan promises to take its bilateral relations with  India to a new high but has always backstabbed us with a Kargil or a Khandhar or  a cold blooded 26/11. It’s like one step forward and four steps  backwards…
But swearing by the Optimism and Idealism Nehru and Gandhi  preached, it still isn’t too late for Pakistan.
I will not conclude by  saying that we can be the best of friends or something of that sort. But I can  surely say that for the betterment of both and for the sake of humankind,  Pakistan should realize that it’s sitting on pile of explosives which will kill  them first and later target us.
“Not Friends, but Friendly,” can be a  Realistic approach at renewing the sour relations between the two countries.  What if we have not been the best of friends, we can in the least try to be GOOD  NEIGHBOURS.
Amen!
